GOP Candidate Needs to Increase Voting Age to 25 – And It is a Nice Thought

By Dr. Derek Ellerman

Poor Vivek Ramaswamy is, a minimum of for the second, a kind of unlucky victims of time and circumstance.

In every other period, I might contemplate the long-shot Republican presidential candidate to a minimum of be attention-grabbing sufficient to comply with, perhaps even help.

Yesterday, Ramaswamy dropped one other good concept that does have my full consideration: He desires to amend the Structure to lift the voting age from 18 to 25.

Sure, Sure, and Hell Sure.

RELATED: Don Lemon Will get Mauled by Republican Vivek Ramaswamy for Declare That ‘Black Individuals Don’t Take pleasure in Freedoms in This Nation’

Increase The Voting Age

Ordinarily, I’m a proponent of only one single age of majority. I’m not essentially hung up on precisely what age that’s, nevertheless it ought to be uniform.

If somebody is a authorized grownup, they need to have all the rights and duties of an grownup; shopping for cigarettes, shopping for alcohol, shopping for a firearm, full obligation, having the ability to hire a automotive, be part of the army, and many others.

Nowadays, there’s a dizzying quantity of proposals all around the nation to lift this or that minimal age requirement for this or that exercise. If somebody is an grownup at 18, why would they should wait one other three years to buy a handgun?

I believe most rational folks view it as not solely ludicrous, however plainly immoral to inform an 18-year-old they need to swimsuit up and go hearth a 155mm howitzer at strangers in some far-off land, however they will’t purchase a bit of pistol or drink a beer.

No person, anyplace, ought to have to maneuver on to the following life with out a sip of the candy nectar.

However I’m on a bit of little bit of a rant right here. Vivek Ramaswamy’s proposal, which he unveiled during a campaign stop in Iowa, would do two issues. Increase the voting age to 25, but in addition enable folks 18-25 to vote in the event that they both do six months within the army or as a primary responder or in the event that they cross the citizenship check.

Ramaswamy described his reasoning thusly: “I believe it’s a downside that younger folks don’t vote sufficient on this nation. However should you make it one thing that you simply really need to earn, you worth it much more. It’s human nature and psychology.”

Honest, and true, so far as it goes.

I’m totally two-thirds in favor of this proposal and I’ll let you know why.

RELATED: Latest GOP Presidential Candidate Vivek Ramaswamy Says He’d Repeal Affirmative Motion ‘With out Apology’

Younger Individuals Are Dumb

Of Ramaswamy’s proposal, I might solely nix the “nationwide service” requirement half. Not as a result of it’s essentially a foul thought or that it wouldn’t have a optimistic affect on citizenship a la Starship Troopers, however as a result of we most likely don’t desire a sudden bubble of thousands and thousands of recent authorities workers with nothing to do.

Idle arms, and all.

As for elevating the voting age, aside from my very own inside cognitive dissonance at backtracking on all the things I simply stated about one uniform age of majority, it’s a should.

You solely want one purpose, too. Have a look at public faculty check scores.

American youngsters can’t even read. Let’s simply cease proper there. We may go down the entire laundry record – they will’t do math, they aren’t taught and subsequently know subsequent to nothing about historical past, and many others – however we don’t have to.

Let’s simply agree that we don’t want to go farther.

In a democracy, each voter counts as a lot as every other. It doesn’t matter if the child within the sales space subsequent to you’ll be able to’t learn. He nonetheless has the identical quantity of energy. He can nonetheless vote for wanton criminality, theft, disastrous international adventurism, and many others.

That’s the total downside with democracy. Individuals with no pores and skin within the sport nonetheless get a say. Malicious actors get the identical say as you. Oh, you spent hours researching the place your Congressman stands on IMF debt restructuring? That dumb child acquired an instruction on who to vote for from a professor.

You’re employed 60 hours per week solely to have half your paycheck stolen for Ukraine’s border or cellphones for unlawful aliens? That dumb child didn’t work for a minute, and he simply voted to improve spending to Ukraine. Doesn’t matter that he couldn’t let you know what continent it’s on to avoid wasting his immortal soul. That vote counts as a lot as yours.

Possibly you’ll be able to see the place I’m going with this. Democracy is silly. Very, very silly. Until there are guardrails.

Now don’t fear, the Earth shall be a burnt crisp falling into the solar earlier than I ever get my method about democracy. However the above nonetheless makes the case that, as long as persons are exercising such an infinite quantity of energy – and energy, my associates, is drive – we must always a minimum of make makes an attempt to make sure voters have a naked minimal of data and life expertise to make such heady choices.

I don’t have sufficient house right here, however my ultimate argument is simply two phrases: Gen Z.

The Structure was already amended to decrease the voting age from 21 to 18. It may be amended once more.

And when faculties begin instructing youngsters issues apart from drag queen story hour, we will take into consideration an modification to decrease it again to 18.

Now’s the time to help and share the sources you belief.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Greatest Political Blogs and Web sites.”

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button